Re: range_agg - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Paul A Jungwirth
Subject Re: range_agg
Date
Msg-id CA+renyV_M=HJSWEaHmGEkw6xesVvxBXABzpCu3HXdC5K-yNcJA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: range_agg  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: range_agg  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 4:39 PM Paul A Jungwirth
<pj@illuminatedcomputing.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 12:20 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > > [ v11 patches ]
> > The cfbot isn't too happy with this; it's getting differently-ordered
> > results than you apparently did for the list of owned objects in
> > dependency.out's DROP OWNED BY test.  Not sure why that should be ---
> > it seems like af6550d34 should have ensured that there's only one
> > possible ordering.
>
> Oh, my last email left out the most important part. :-) Is this
> failure online somewhere so I can take a look at it and fix it?

Looks like I sent this just to Tom before. This is something I need to
fix, right?

Regards,
Paul



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Paul A Jungwirth
Date:
Subject: Re: range_agg
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: backup manifests