Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022)
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGLzXzQcbjEHW08Z6g=mzBkpLtzSJ7Bt2S2XmxP1bwpq8A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 3:28 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I agree that starting to rely on PRI?64 in translatable strings
> is raising the bar a good deal, so maybe it's time to do something
> about that.

Perhaps meson/configure should do a po -> mo -> gettext() check with a
canned test message?  That'd also make sure your msgfmt and libintl
are compatible, something I worried about when I wrote about musl
recently.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_subscription_ddl() function
Next
From: jian he
Date:
Subject: Re: transformJsonFuncExpr pathspec cache lookup failed