On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 9:34 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> > Why is this being proposed?
>
> Andres is annoyed by the long build time of ecpg, which he has to
> wait for whether he wants to test it or not. I could imagine that
> I might disable ecpg testing on my slowest buildfarm animals, too.
This message triggered me to try to teach ccache how to cache
preproc.y -> preproc.{c,h}, and I got that basically working[1], but
upstream doesn't want it (yet). I'll try again if the proposed
refactoring to allow more kinds of compiler-like-things goes
somewhere. I think that started with people's struggles with GCC vs
MSVC. Given the simplicity of this case, though, I suppose we could
have a little not-very-general shell/python/whatever wrapper script --
just compute a checksum of the input and keep the output files around.
[1] https://github.com/ccache/ccache/pull/1156
