On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 8:52 PM Paul Guo <guopa@vmware.com> wrote:
> About the syncfs patch, my first impression on the guc name sync_after_crash
> is that it is a boolean type. Not sure about other people's feeling. Do you guys think
> It is better to rename it to a clearer name like sync_method_after_crash or others?
Works for me. Here is a new version like that, also including the
documentation change discussed with Fujii-san, and a couple of
cosmetic changes.
