Re: Bogus collation version recording in recordMultipleDependencies - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Bogus collation version recording in recordMultipleDependencies
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGLkNYEJ+Yzj5JcuS91yRjF8fuM0E86=bvWPEQ0FXZp0ow@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bogus collation version recording in recordMultipleDependencies  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Bogus collation version recording in recordMultipleDependencies
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 8:58 AM Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> this is an open item for release 14 . The discussion seems to have gone
> silent for a couple of weeks. Are we in a position to make any
> decisions? I hear what Andres says, but is anyone acting on it?

I'm going to revert this and resubmit for 15.  That'll give proper
time to reconsider the question of whether pg_depend is right for
this, and come up with a non-rushed response to the composite type
problem etc.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: cache lookup failed for statistics object 123
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Dubious assertion in RegisterDynamicBackgroundWorker