Re: Bogus collation version recording in recordMultipleDependencies - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Bogus collation version recording in recordMultipleDependencies
Date
Msg-id 5b32c64e-1b81-5ec4-c150-88fd71720627@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bogus collation version recording in recordMultipleDependencies  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Bogus collation version recording in recordMultipleDependencies
List pgsql-hackers
On 5/5/21 5:12 PM, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 8:58 AM Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>> this is an open item for release 14 . The discussion seems to have gone
>> silent for a couple of weeks. Are we in a position to make any
>> decisions? I hear what Andres says, but is anyone acting on it?
> I'm going to revert this and resubmit for 15.  That'll give proper
> time to reconsider the question of whether pg_depend is right for
> this, and come up with a non-rushed response to the composite type
> problem etc.


OK, thanks.


cheers


andrew


--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Dubious assertion in RegisterDynamicBackgroundWorker
Next
From: Matthias van de Meent
Date:
Subject: Re: MaxOffsetNumber for Table AMs