Re: [PATCH] add relation and block-level filtering to pg_waldump - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: [PATCH] add relation and block-level filtering to pg_waldump
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGL+0PrQmEnnHidi1Vc-5f8Bqo4bpHAbuBk778c1k8Aiow@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] add relation and block-level filtering to pg_waldump  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] add relation and block-level filtering to pg_waldump  (David Christensen <david.christensen@crunchydata.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 12:26 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 12:01 AM Peter Eisentraut
> <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> > Or even:  Why are we exposing fork *numbers* in the user interface?
> > Even low-level tools such as pageinspect use fork *names* in their
> > interface.
>
> I wondered about that but thought it seemed OK for such a low level
> tool.  It's a fair point though, especially if other low level tools
> are doing that.  Here's a patch to change it.

Oh, and there's already a name lookup function to use for this.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jesper Pedersen
Date:
Subject: Re: Index Skip Scan (new UniqueKeys)
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: turn fastgetattr and heap_getattr to inline functions