Re: [PATCH] add relation and block-level filtering to pg_waldump - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: [PATCH] add relation and block-level filtering to pg_waldump
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKG+h-1qbQS0w0ARR73gw+Mv1fcxVZaFMycQS3JGc8iZiZA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] add relation and block-level filtering to pg_waldump  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] add relation and block-level filtering to pg_waldump  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 12:01 AM Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Or even:  Why are we exposing fork *numbers* in the user interface?
> Even low-level tools such as pageinspect use fork *names* in their
> interface.

I wondered about that but thought it seemed OK for such a low level
tool.  It's a fair point though, especially if other low level tools
are doing that.  Here's a patch to change it.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add relation and block-level filtering to pg_waldump
Next
From: Jesper Pedersen
Date:
Subject: Re: MDAM techniques and Index Skip Scan patch