Re: ci: Allow running mingw tests by default via environment variable - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: ci: Allow running mingw tests by default via environment variable
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGKeU=YStaX_3AjJakTBOO_dBTPj4mf8sEkQOVjLqs7qEA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ci: Allow running mingw tests by default via environment variable  (Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: ci: Allow running mingw tests by default via environment variable
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 12:02 AM Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 at 05:12, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > I propose that we instead run the task automatically if
> > $REPO_MINGW_TRIGGER_BY_DEFAULT is set, typically in cirrus' per-repository
> > configuration.
> >
> > Unfortunately that's somewhat awkward to do in the cirrus-ci yaml
> > configuration, the set of conditional expressions supported is very
> > simplistic.
> >
> > To deal with that, I extended .cirrus.star to compute the required environment
> > variable. If $REPO_MINGW_TRIGGER_BY_DEFAULT is set, CI_MINGW_TRIGGER_TYPE is
> > set to 'automatic', if not it's 'manual'.
>
> Changes look good to me. My only complaint could be using only 'true'
> for the REPO_MINGW_TRIGGER_BY_DEFAULT, not a possible list of values
> but this is not important.

Here's a generalised version of 0001.  If you put this in your
repository settings on Cirrus's website:

REPO_CI_AUTOMATIC_TRIGGER_TASKS="mingw netbsd"

... then it defines:

CI_TRIGGER_TYPE_MINGW=automatic
CI_TRIGGER_TYPE_NETBSD=automatic
CI_TRIGGER_TYPE_OPENBSD=manual

The set of tasks that get this treatment is defined by this line in
.cirrus.star:

    default_manual_trigger_tasks = ['mingw', 'netbsd', 'openbsd']

Then the individual tasks in .cirrus.tasks.yml use those variables:

     - name: NetBSD - Meson
+      # See REPO_CI_AUTOMATIC_TRIGGER_TASKS in .cirrus.star
+      trigger_type: $CI_TRIGGER_TYPE_NETBSD

Unfortunately the funky Starlark language doesn't seem to have regular
expressions, so it's just searching for those substrings without
contemplating delimiters.  That doesn't seem to be a problem at this
scale...

(I didn't look at the second patch today.)

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding NetBSD and OpenBSD to Postgres CI
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: per backend WAL statistics