Re: Adding NetBSD and OpenBSD to Postgres CI - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Adding NetBSD and OpenBSD to Postgres CI
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGLZ0i6U+VvZ+_UVpX+z8D=uwNzv8s-Crtq1bNy62sBo5A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Adding NetBSD and OpenBSD to Postgres CI  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 11:39 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2025-03-04 11:35:30 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > I propose to turn these on by default tomorrow, unless someone speaks
> > up with reasons why we shouldn't.

> I'm worried about enabling them by default eating up CI credits even
> faster. Not for cfbot, where we bring our own compute resources, but for folks
> own repos.

It would be nice to know what the expected cost in Cirrus credits is
for each task, and the per-month limit for personal repos.  mingw must
be *vastly* more expensive than these little guys (licence cost +
run time).

> I quite evidently lost track of that patch, but I think we should instead pick
> https://postgr.es/m/20240413021221.hg53rvqlvldqh57i%40awork3.anarazel.de back
> up, with that we could enable these tasks by default for cfbot, without
> enabling them for everyone.

WFM in the meantime until we can turbo-boost the TAP tests.  I will respond
over there...



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: ci: Allow running mingw tests by default via environment variable