On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 9:57 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 9:49 AM Gregory Stark (as CFM)
> <stark.cfm@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 at 23:04, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Done like that in this version. This is the version I'm thinking of
> > > committing, unless someone wants to argue for another level.
> >
> > FWIW the cfbot doesn't understand this patch series. I'm not sure why
> > but it's only trying to apply the first (the MacOS one) and it's
> > failing to apply even that.
>
> Ah, it's because I committed one patch in the series. I'll commit one
> more, and then repost the rest, shortly.
I pushed the main patch, "Don't leak descriptors into subprograms.".
Here's a rebase of the POSIX-next stuff, but I'll sit on these for a
bit longer to see if the build farm agrees with my claim about the
ubiquity of O_CLOEXEC, and if anyone has comments on this stuff.
