Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Windows Application Issues | PostgreSQL | REF # 48475607 - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Windows Application Issues | PostgreSQL | REF # 48475607
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGJOoVT1iTqgvt4xynTG=tFCfjzZAs-0hQ7Pv3veiNhwwQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Windows Application Issues | PostgreSQL | REF # 48475607  ("Haifang Wang (Centific Technologies Inc)" <v-haiwang@microsoft.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 12:13 PM Haifang Wang (Centific Technologies
Inc) <v-haiwang@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Thanks, Tom. Is there any suggestion on how to track all the conversations in one thread? Seems like all our previous
discussionare in different mail thread. It is not easy to track. 😊 

FWIW this shows up as one thread in my email client, and in the
PostgreSQL archives website[1].  I don't know much about email and
which RFCs or conventions are at work here, but apparently different
clients are using different techniques to identify threads.  I assume
it could be done with thread headers (as seen in this thread) or
reply-to chains or fuzzy recognition of subject etc.  Given that
Outlook seems to ignore the "> " inline response quoting convention
used by the rest of the internet, it wouldn't surprise me to hear that
it also doesn't follow the conventions for recognising threads either,
being a sort of related topic.

[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/PH8PR21MB3902F334A3174C54058F792CE5182%40PH8PR21MB3902.namprd21.prod.outlook.com



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Minor update on pg_hba documentation
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #17947: Combination of replslots pgstat issues causes error/assertion failure