Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast?
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGJEnDbJ2m9+Aw3GUMoAw0E9gvWHmU1QHTFt=7wBOyVyLw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast?  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast?  (Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>)
Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 11:14 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> * updated OIDs to avoid collisions
> * added btequalimage to btree/xid8_ops

Here's the version I'm planning to commit tomorrow, if no one objects.  Changes:

* txid.c renamed to xid8funcs.c
* remaining traces of "txid" replaced various internal identifiers
* s/backwards compatible/backward compatible/ in funcs.sgml (en_GB -> en_US)
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill)
Next
From: Corey Huinker
Date:
Subject: Re: Add A Glossary