Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKG+oFsGCN3HkG_-_U9fKqpQkL48RZ-0AKg7H5biLnXC76A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 12:29 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 08:11:09PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Based on what I can see, the Windows animals seem to have digested
> > 47bd0b3 (cygwin, MinGW and MSVC), so I think that we are good.

Great, that's a lot of nice cleanup.

> The last part that's worth adjusting is ldap_start_tls_sA(), which
> would lead to the attached simplification.

-        if ((r = _ldap_start_tls_sA(*ldap, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL))
!= LDAP_SUCCESS)
+        if ((r = ldap_start_tls_sA(*ldap, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL)) !=
LDAP_SUCCESS)

When looking the function up it made sense to use the name ending in
'...A', but when calling directly I think we shouldn't use the A
suffix, we should let the <winldap.h> macros do that for us[1].  (I
wondered for a moment if that would even make Windows and Unix code
the same, but sadly not due to the extra NULL arguments.)

[1] https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/winldap/nf-winldap-ldap_start_tls_sa



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: New docs chapter on Transaction Management and related changes
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Splitting up guc.c