On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 4:08 AM Jacob Champion
<jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> 0001 will fix that. I think we should get that and 0002 in, ASAP. (And
> the others.)
All pushed (wasn't sure if Daniel was going to but once I got tangled
up in all that kqueue stuff he probably quite reasonably assumed that
I would :-)).
> Thomas has shown me a side quest to get rid of the second
> kqueue instance, but so far that is not bearing fruit and we shouldn't
> wait on it.
Cool, thanks for looking into it anyway. (Feel free to post a
nonworking patch with a got-stuck-here-because problem statement...)
