Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jacob Champion
Subject Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Date
Msg-id CAOYmi+kKjhOnwU1LmDksf6RSZtVe9QXnH+6HDuiR=Cv9Z+MnFw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER  (Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 4:37 AM Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just wanted to report that the 'oauth_validator/t/001_server.pl'
> test failed on FreeBSD in one of my local CI runs [1]. I looked at the
> thread but could not find the same error report; if this is already
> known, please excuse me.

Thanks for the report! Yes, this looks like the issue that NetBSD was having:

> [11:09:56.548] # [libcurl] *   Trying [::1]:39251...
> [11:09:56.548] # [libcurl] * Connected to localhost (::1) port 39251

Curl should not have connected to ::1 (the test server isn't listening
on IPv6). Whatever is talking on that port doesn't understand HTTP,
and we later fail with the "HTTP/0.9" error -- a slightly confusing
way to describe a protocol violation.

0001 will fix that. I think we should get that and 0002 in, ASAP. (And
the others.) Thomas has shown me a side quest to get rid of the second
kqueue instance, but so far that is not bearing fruit and we shouldn't
wait on it.

Thanks again!
--Jacob



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: PG 18 major release notes
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Forbid to DROP temp tables of other sessions