Re: Windows default locale vs initdb - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Windows default locale vs initdb
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKG+Pa28J-SCsn6d5x8KkqgqdAQ7q-pTgMYrht9B-c0dD5w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Windows default locale vs initdb  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Windows default locale vs initdb
List pgsql-hackers
Another country has changed its name, and a Windows OS update has
again broken every PostgreSQL cluster in that whole country[1] (or at
least those that had accepted initdb's default choice of locale,
probably most).  Let's get to the bottom of this, because otherwise it
is simply going to keep happening, causing administrative pain for a
lot of people.

Here is a rebase of the basic patch I proposed last time, and a
re-statement of what we know:

1.  initdb chooses a default locale using a technique that gives you
an unstable ("Czech Republic"->"Czechia", "Turkey"->"Türkiye"),
non-ASCII ("Norwegian (Bokmål)") string that we are warned we should
not store anywhere.  We store it, and then later it is not recognised.
Instead we should select an IETF BCP 47 locale name, based on stable
ISO country and language codes, like "en-US", "tr-TR" etc.  Here is
the patch to teach initdb to use that, unchanged from v3 except that I
tweaked the docs a bit.

2.  In Windows 10+ it is now also possible to put ".UTF-8" on the end
of locale names.  I couldn't figure out whether we should do that, and
what effect it has on ctypes -- apparently not the effect I expected
(see upthread).  Was our UTF-8 support on Windows already broken, and
this new ".UTF-8" thing is just a new way to reach that brokenness?
Is it OK to continue to choose the "legacy" single byte encodings by
default on that OS, and consider that a separate topic for separate
research?

3.  It is not clear to me how we should deal with pg_upgrade.
Eventually we want all of the old-school names to fade away, and
pg_upgrade would need to be part of that.  Perhaps there is some API
that can be used to translate to the new canonical forms without us
having to maintain translation tables and other messiness in our tree.

4.  Eventually we should probably ban non-ASCII characters from
entering the relevant catalogues (they are shared, so their encoding
is undefined except that they must be a superset of ASCII), and delete
all the old win32setlocale.c kludges, after we reach a point where
everyone should be using exclusively BCP 47.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/18196-b10f93dfbde3d7db%40postgresql.org

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Change GUC hashtable to use simplehash?
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication