Re: Relation bulk write facility - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Relation bulk write facility
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKG+NO4-1Fbg9+-DQEekqeLtcwGm9KNGyBTW3HiReY9vnwg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Relation bulk write facility  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Relation bulk write facility
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 9:12 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 8:50 AM Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
> > On GNU/Linux x64, gcc correctly records alignment=2**12 for the associated
> > section (.rodata for bulk_write.o zero_buffer, .bss for pg_prewarm.o
> > blockbuffer).  If I'm reading this right, neither AIX gcc nor xlc is marking
> > the section with sufficient alignment, in bulk_write.o or pg_prewarm.o:
>
> Ah, that is a bit of a hazard that we should probably document.
>
> I guess the ideas to fix this would be: use smgrzeroextend() instead
> of this coding, and/or perhaps look at the coding of pg_pwrite_zeros()
> (function-local static) for any other place that needs such a thing,
> if it would be satisfied by function-local scope?

Erm, wait, how does that function-local static object work differently?



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Relation bulk write facility
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: Relation bulk write facility