Re: pg14 psql broke \d datname.nspname.relname - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: pg14 psql broke \d datname.nspname.relname
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKG+L0AE-Tb6K4YV9YvG0c-ajpe5FZduumRTnia5Cv5fj-w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg14 psql broke \d datname.nspname.relname  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg14 psql broke \d datname.nspname.relname  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 3:55 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 10:20 PM Mark Dilger
> <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> > Looks like most people voted for (B).  In support of that option, here are patches for master and REL_14_STABLE.
Notethat I extended the tests compared to v9, which found a problem that is fixed for v10:
 
>
> OK, I committed these. I am not totally sure we've got all the
> problems sorted here, but I don't think that continuing to not commit
> anything is going to be better, so here we go.

Looks like this somehow broke on a Windows box:

https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=jacana&dt=2022-04-20%2016%3A34%3A19

[14:05:49.729](0.001s) not ok 16 - pg_dumpall: option
--exclude-database rejects multipart pattern ".*": matches
[14:05:49.730](0.000s)
[14:05:49.730](0.000s) #   Failed test 'pg_dumpall: option
--exclude-database rejects multipart pattern ".*": matches'
#   at t/002_pg_dump.pl line 3985.
[14:05:49.730](0.000s) #                   'pg_dumpall: error:
improper qualified name (too many dotted names): .gitignore
# '
#     doesn't match '(?^:pg_dumpall: error: improper qualified name
\\(too many dotted names\\): \\.\\*)'



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Bad estimate with partial index
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: preserving db/ts/relfilenode OIDs across pg_upgrade (was Re: storing an explicit nonce)