Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Masahiko Sawada
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Date
Msg-id CA+fd4k6h1+Tj6n=iYiXLPx509fM8bTfFvEMNERd_NzKVnW6iGQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 at 22:48, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 12:41 AM Masahiko Sawada
> <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > Attached the updated version patch. This version patch incorporates
> > the above comments and the comments from Mahendra. I also fixed one
> > bug around determining the indexes that are vacuumed in parallel based
> > on their option and size. Please review it.
>
> I'm not enthusiastic about the fact that 0003 calls the fast option
> 'disable_delay' in some places. I think it would be more clear to call
> it 'fast' everywhere.
>

Agreed.

I've attached the updated version patch that incorporated the all
review comments I go so far.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada            http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions
Next
From: "tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance