Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYNk0P1Wm3NZJ0_1TFky5CiDDgHJzQJy602uJN+g=+wWA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum  (Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum  (Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 12:41 AM Masahiko Sawada
<masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Attached the updated version patch. This version patch incorporates
> the above comments and the comments from Mahendra. I also fixed one
> bug around determining the indexes that are vacuumed in parallel based
> on their option and size. Please review it.

I'm not enthusiastic about the fact that 0003 calls the fast option
'disable_delay' in some places. I think it would be more clear to call
it 'fast' everywhere.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
Date:
Subject: Re: segmentation fault when cassert enabled
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: non-exclusive backup cleanup is mildly broken