Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Jorge Solórzano
Subject Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Date
Msg-id CA+cVU8MWeV8P1_47ORiB7_q94i6P=huOaatvQr0DYpD8XT6Avg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion  (Jorge Solórzano <jorsol@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
List pgsql-jdbc
Or better yet, simply append .jre8 to the version, that way 42.0.0.jre8 > 42.0.0.jre7 > 42.0.0.jre6 and when Java 9 comes out it will be easy to use .jre9 and there will be no problem to identify what Java version it target.


El mar., 29 de nov. de 2016 10:57 AM, Jorge Solórzano <jorsol@gmail.com> escribió:
Vladimir, what do you think about using classifier in pgjdbc? It probably can simplify build of different jar and at the same time have proper versioning in maven.

In maven rules 42.0.0.jre7 > 42.0.0 (jre8) so this should help with correct versioning.


El lun., 28 de nov. de 2016 3:17 PM, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com> escribió:
I've pushed 42.0.0-SNAPSHOT to the pgjdbc/master.

Vladimir
--

Jorge

--

Jorge Solórzano
me.jorsol.com

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Jorge Solórzano
Date:
Subject: Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Next
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion