Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Date
Msg-id CADK3HHLdyOdG1At59gDU4uWV7uweP4SVd-Zc=QY_suqsifF0mw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion  (Jorge Solórzano <jorsol@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
List pgsql-jdbc

On 29 November 2016 at 18:54, Jorge Solórzano <jorsol@gmail.com> wrote:
Or better yet, simply append .jre8 to the version, that way 42.0.0.jre8 > 42.0.0.jre7 > 42.0.0.jre6 and when Java 9 comes out it will be easy to use .jre9 and there will be no problem to identify what Java version it target.

Once we go to java 9 we won't need to, it supports versioned jars, we've had this discussion before. http://postgresql.nabble.com/Maven-Artifact-JDK-Suffix-td5881398.html

Dave

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Jorge Solórzano
Date:
Subject: Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Next
From: Jorge Solórzano
Date:
Subject: Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion