Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Jorge Solórzano
Subject Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Date
Msg-id CA+cVU8Ozc2FFS5bbd8z+8WYs+Vc0_AKEq1eyYKYCb2PysEDQBg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Good to know Dave, I was not aware about the multi-jar in Java 9.

El mar., 29 de nov. de 2016 7:32 PM, Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> escribió:
On 29 November 2016 at 18:54, Jorge Solórzano <jorsol@gmail.com> wrote:
Or better yet, simply append .jre8 to the version, that way 42.0.0.jre8 > 42.0.0.jre7 > 42.0.0.jre6 and when Java 9 comes out it will be easy to use .jre9 and there will be no problem to identify what Java version it target.

Once we go to java 9 we won't need to, it supports versioned jars, we've had this discussion before. http://postgresql.nabble.com/Maven-Artifact-JDK-Suffix-td5881398.html

Dave
--

Jorge Solórzano
me.jorsol.com

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Next
From: Manoj Palhade
Date:
Subject: Database reset connection