On 15 July 2014 19:15, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
>> Reset master xmin when hot_standby_feedback disabled.
>> If walsender has xmin of standby then ensure we
>> reset the value to 0 when we change from hot_standby_feedback=on
>> to hot_standby_feedback=off.
>
>> Branch
>> ------
>> REL9_2_STABLE
>
>
> While I'm not necessarily objecting to the content of this patch,
> I do have a problem with the process. Where was the discussion of
> why this change should be back-patched? (If I'm identifying it
> correctly, this is a back-patch of commit bd56e7412, a year and a
> half later. That should have been noted in the commit message, too,
> rather than leaving people to reconstruct why you'd only committed
> into two old branches.)
Sorry if my actions confused.
I kept the commit message deliberately identical to help people, not to confuse.
There was recent discussion of it on-list and a public request to
backpatch, which I agreed with and acknowledged.
-- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
