Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nMKU1WhHUBSwNDK1suC+jnXXSEqN_REanjPhpVvBKDViUg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Responses Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 24 January 2014 07:08, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> v15 to fix the above problem.
>
> Minor quibble: I get a compiler warning with the patch applied.
> "relcache.c: In function 'RememberToFreeTupleDescAtEOX':
> relcache.c:2317:3: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and
> code [-Werror=declaration-after-statement]".

Thanks, that was a wart, now fixed.

v16 attached

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: GIN improvements part 1: additional information
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: GIN improvements part 1: additional information