Re: patch: improve SLRU replacement algorithm - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: patch: improve SLRU replacement algorithm
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nM+3qXwfJaRdRyFXWvvF4t151-BJY5cq5jWgGOSFdeviRg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: patch: improve SLRU replacement algorithm  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: patch: improve SLRU replacement algorithm
Re: patch: improve SLRU replacement algorithm
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes, the SLRU is thrashing heavily.  In this configuration, there are
> 32 CLOG buffers.  I just added an elog() every time we replace a
> buffer.  Here's a sample of how often that's firing, by second, on
> this test (pgbench with 32 clients):

Interesting. You've spoken at length how this hardly ever happens and
so this can't have any performance effect. That was the reason for
kicking out my patch addressing clog history, wasn't it?

Why is this pgbench run accessing so much unhinted data that is > 1
million transactions old? Do you believe those numbers? Looks weird.

Perhaps we should retest the clog history patch?

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: patch: improve SLRU replacement algorithm
Next
From: Euler Taveira
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres long options without value