On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 2:54 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 02:38:53PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Indeed, looks good to me. I'll go fix, ust let's wait and see first
> > if others have any comments.
>
> Actually, I was reading again the new sentence, and did not like its
> first part. Here is a rework that looks much better to me:
> * Load hardcoded DH parameters.
> *
> - * To prevent problems if the DH parameter files don't even exist, we
> - * can load hardcoded DH parameters supplied with the backend.
> + * If DH parameters cannot be loaded from a specified file, we can load
> + * the hardcoded DH parameters supplied with the backend to prevent
> + * problems.
>
> Daniel, is that fine for you?
I don't understand why that change is an improvement.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
