Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmobv==grm2gOdHk=njx9DoXDvoK=D0Hen7fHMBdoM34ysw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On 2015-08-03 PM 09:24, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 12:18 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> OK, sure.  But let's make sure postgres_fdw gets a server-level option
>>> to control this.
>>>
>>>
>> For postgres_fdw it's a boolean server-level option 'twophase_compliant'
>> (suggestions for name welcome).
>>
>
> How about just 'twophase'?

How about two_phase_commit?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Sharing aggregate states between different aggregate functions