Re: Sharing aggregate states between different aggregate functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: Sharing aggregate states between different aggregate functions
Date
Msg-id CAKJS1f8bK5=+qdLh_p=h1N--ia+g6B9G1chXxzfn1g3uHvKehQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Sharing aggregate states between different aggregate functions  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 5 August 2015 at 03:03, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
On 08/03/2015 08:53 AM, David Rowley wrote:
Attached is a delta patched which is based
on sharing_aggstate-heikki-2.patch to fix up the out-dated comments and
also a few more test scenarios which test the sharing works with matching
INITCOND and that it does not when they don't match.

What do you think?

I committed this, after some more cleanup of the comments. Thanks!


Great! Thanks for doing the cleanups and committing it.

--
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE using EXCLUDED.column gives an error about mismatched types