Re: Sharing aggregate states between different aggregate functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: Sharing aggregate states between different aggregate functions
Date
Msg-id 55C0D445.9090907@iki.fi
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Sharing aggregate states between different aggregate functions  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Sharing aggregate states between different aggregate functions  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 08/03/2015 08:53 AM, David Rowley wrote:
> Attached is a delta patched which is based
> on sharing_aggstate-heikki-2.patch to fix up the out-dated comments and
> also a few more test scenarios which test the sharing works with matching
> INITCOND and that it does not when they don't match.
>
> What do you think?

I committed this, after some more cleanup of the comments. Thanks!

- Heikki




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Date:
Subject: Re: Doubt about AccessExclusiveLock in ALTER TABLE .. SET ( .. );
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: FSM versus GIN pending list bloat