Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
Date
Msg-id 55C00505.3060308@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
List pgsql-hackers
On 2015-08-03 PM 09:24, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 12:18 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> OK, sure.  But let's make sure postgres_fdw gets a server-level option
>> to control this.
>>
>>
> For postgres_fdw it's a boolean server-level option 'twophase_compliant'
> (suggestions for name welcome).
> 

How about just 'twophase'?

Thanks,
Amit






pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Date:
Subject: Re: Doubt about AccessExclusiveLock in ALTER TABLE .. SET ( .. );
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Doubt about AccessExclusiveLock in ALTER TABLE .. SET ( .. );