Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
Date
Msg-id 55C15DE7.2090108@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
List pgsql-hackers
On 2015-08-05 AM 06:11, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> On 2015-08-03 PM 09:24, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>>> For postgres_fdw it's a boolean server-level option 'twophase_compliant'
>>> (suggestions for name welcome).
>>>
>>
>> How about just 'twophase'?
> 
> How about two_phase_commit?
> 

Much cleaner, +1

Thanks,
Amit




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: Make timestamptz_out less slow.
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Doubt about AccessExclusiveLock in ALTER TABLE .. SET ( .. );