On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 11:07 AM Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> > Well, what this would lose is the ability to selectively restore
> > individual large objects using "pg_restore -L". I'm not sure who
> > out there might be depending on that, but if we assume that's the
> > empty set I fear we'll find out it's not. So a workaround switch
> > seemed possibly worth the trouble. I don't have a position yet
> > on which way ought to be the default.
>
> OK, fair point. I suspect making the batched mode the default would gain
> more friends than enemies.
A lot of people probably don't know that selective restore even exists
but it is an AWESOME feature and I'd hate to see us break it, or even
just degrade it.
I wonder if we can't find a better solution than bunching TOC entries
together. Perhaps we don't need every TOC entry in memory
simultaneously, for instance, especially things like LOBs that don't
have dependencies.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
