On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 9:31 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> Hmm. That would mean that the more LOs a cluster has, the more bloat
> there will be in the new cluster once the upgrade is done. That could
> be quite a few gigs worth of data laying around depending on the data
> inserted in the source cluster, and we don't have a way to know which
> files to remove post-upgrade, do we?
The files that are being leaked here are the files backing the
pg_largeobject table and the corresponding index as they existed in
the new cluster just prior to the upgrade. Hopefully, the table is a
zero-length file and the index is just one block, because you're
supposed to use a newly-initdb'd cluster as the target for a
pg_upgrade operation. Now, you don't actually have to do that: as
we've been discussing, there aren't as many sanity checks in this code
as there probably should be. But it would still be surprising to
initdb a new cluster, load gigabytes of large objects into it, and
then use it as the target cluster for a pg_upgrade.
As for whether it's possible to know which files to remove
post-upgrade, that's the same problem as trying to figure out whether
their are orphaned files in any other PostgreSQL cluster. We don't
have a tool for it, but if you're sure that the system is more or less
quiescent - no uncommitted DDL, in particular - you can compare
pg_class.relfilenode to the actual filesystem contents and figure out
what extra stuff is present on the filesystem level.
I am not saying we shouldn't try to fix this up more thoroughly, just
that I think you are overestimating the consequences.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
