Re: Pglogical questions and problems - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Pglogical questions and problems
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobnJfmcH0as9MFzWB6xPmUCH2xCZ2gd2xUeAQjyS97xGg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Pglogical questions and problems  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Pglogical questions and problems  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: Pglogical questions and problems  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 4:38 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Anyway, who agrees with the overall design of pglogical and who does not?

I haven't spent very much time on it yet.  I tend to prefer the idea
of integrating it more deeply into core and adding SQL syntax around
it, but I'm not going to fight tooth and nail for that if a contrary
consensus emerges.

I think this would be a good topic to discuss at PGCon.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold <
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Incomplete startup packet errors