Re: Server-side base backup: why superuser, not pg_write_server_files? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Server-side base backup: why superuser, not pg_write_server_files?
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoba-3Uf5KiCF3Qa6V0BnyMWhCB4a2ND5_euTsO=3EszPQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Server-side base backup: why superuser, not pg_write_server_files?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Server-side base backup: why superuser, not pg_write_server_files?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 12:55 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> > This seems like a good idea, but I'm not going to slip a change from
> > an exact test count to done_testing() into a commit on some other
> > topic...
>
> Actually, it seemed that the consensus in the nearby thread [1]
> was to start doing exactly that, rather than try to convert them
> all in one big push.

Urk. Well, OK then.

Such an approach seems to me to have essentially nothing to recommend
it, but I just work here.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: archive modules
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Server-side base backup: why superuser, not pg_write_server_files?