Re: Server-side base backup: why superuser, not pg_write_server_files? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Server-side base backup: why superuser, not pg_write_server_files?
Date
Msg-id 36427.1643827599@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Server-side base backup: why superuser, not pg_write_server_files?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Server-side base backup: why superuser, not pg_write_server_files?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 12:55 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Actually, it seemed that the consensus in the nearby thread [1]
>> was to start doing exactly that, rather than try to convert them
>> all in one big push.

> Urk. Well, OK then.

> Such an approach seems to me to have essentially nothing to recommend
> it, but I just work here.

Well, if someone wants to step up and provide a patch that changes 'em
all at once, that'd be great.  But we've discussed this before and
nothing's happened.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Server-side base backup: why superuser, not pg_write_server_files?
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Deparsing rewritten query