Re: Wait for parallel workers to attach - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Wait for parallel workers to attach
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobD6i_wCb0dvkv3vtGkS006RxVTXf27EQBhqeTjCRPq-g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Wait for parallel workers to attach  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Wait for parallel workers to attach  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 9:48 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 9:09 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:08 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I think suggesting to use this API to wait "for a specific worker"
>>> doesn't seem like a good idea as it doesn't have any such provision.
>>
>> I see your point, but in the absence of a more specific API it could
>> be used that way, and it wouldn't be unreasonable.  Just might wait a
>> little longer than absolutely necessary.
>
> Fair enough, you can proceed with the patch.

Committed.  Now, on to the main event!

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping
Next
From: Claudio Freire
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Vacuum: Update FSM more frequently