Re: Wait for parallel workers to attach - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Wait for parallel workers to attach
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1+J+iqR3qE03fFHK2kNB+CNF6Q7oBads7zj=7caROFejw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Wait for parallel workers to attach  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Wait for parallel workers to attach  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 9:09 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:08 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think suggesting to use this API to wait "for a specific worker"
>> doesn't seem like a good idea as it doesn't have any such provision.
>
> I see your point, but in the absence of a more specific API it could
> be used that way, and it wouldn't be unreasonable.  Just might wait a
> little longer than absolutely necessary.
>

Fair enough, you can proceed with the patch.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki"
Date:
Subject: [bug fix] ECPG: freeing memory for pgtypes crashes on Windows
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: alternative psql commands quit and exit