Re: Wait for parallel workers to attach - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Wait for parallel workers to attach
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoa8kn2M=PHw8q6t67bFOUcHvmDr-WhzDcuBu0TuSXddMg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Wait for parallel workers to attach  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Wait for parallel workers to attach  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:08 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think suggesting to use this API to wait "for a specific worker"
> doesn't seem like a good idea as it doesn't have any such provision.

I see your point, but in the absence of a more specific API it could
be used that way, and it wouldn't be unreasonable.  Just might wait a
little longer than absolutely necessary.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Temporary tables prevent autovacuum, leading to XID wraparound
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Creating backup history files for backups taken from standbys