On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 3:23 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> ISTM that it'd be pretty broken if it could happen. We cannot have two
> different parts of the system send messages to the client
> independently. The protocol is pretty stateful...
There's a difference between building messages concurrently and
sending them concurrently.
> Set a boolean and assert out if one already is in progress? We'd need
> some state to know where to reset the position to on error anyway.
Sure, that's basically just different notation for the same thing. I
might prefer my notation over yours, but you might prefer the reverse.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
