On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 11:14 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> > +1 for Peter's proposal to just alphabetize. That's easy to maintain,
> > at least in theory.
>
> Agreed for single-letter options. Long options complicate matters:
> are we going to order their code stanzas by the actual long name, or
> by the character/number returned by getopt? Or are we going to be
> willing to repeatedly renumber the assigned codes to keep those the
> same? I don't think I want to go that far.
I was only talking about the actual argument to getopt(), not the
order of the code stanzas. I'm not sure what we ought to do about the
latter.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
