Re: Error-safe user functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Error-safe user functions
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZHVbfhv2+9G=DDNAMDtjEFX3CF684Sw+8Dh95qtqudwg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Error-safe user functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Error-safe user functions  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: Error-safe user functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 11:09 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 10:57 PM Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> 2. ereturn_* => errfeedback / error_feedback / feedback
>
> > Oh, I like that, especially errfeedback.
>
> efeedback?  But TBH I do not think any of these are better than ereturn.

I do. Having a macro name that is "return" plus one character is going
to make people think that it returns. I predict that if you insist on
using that name people are still going to be making mistakes based on
that confusion 10 years from now.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump: Remove "blob" terminology
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Order getopt arguments