Re: Verbose output of pg_dump not show schema name - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Verbose output of pg_dump not show schema name
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoaz46egBvLJSOOTW8cXDz3cPibsWz9MMsLGms0VHqJ_pQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Verbose output of pg_dump not show schema name  (Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Verbose output of pg_dump not show schema name
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
<fabriziomello@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 4:29 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
>> <fabriziomello@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:44:37AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> >> > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>> >> > > The idea is that we only need quotes when there are odd characters
>> >> > > in
>> >> > > the identifier.  We do that right now in some places, though I
>> >> > > can't
>> >> > > find them in pg_dump.  I know psql does that, see quote_ident().
>> >> >
>> >> > I think our general style rule is that identifiers embedded in
>> >> > messages
>> >> > are always double-quoted.  There's an exception for type names, but
>> >> > not otherwise.  You're confusing the message case with printing SQL.
>> >>
>> >> OK.  I was unclear if a status _display_ was a message like an error
>> >> message.
>> >>
>> >
>> > The attached patch fix missing double-quoted in "dumping contents of
>> > table.." message and add schema name to other messages:
>> > - "reading indexes for table \"%s\".\"%s\"\n"
>> > - "reading foreign key constraints for table \"%s\".\"%s\"\n"
>> > - "reading triggers for table \"%s\".\"%s\"\n"
>> >
>> > - "finding the columns and types of table \"%s\".\"%s\"\n"
>> > - "finding default expressions of table \"%s\".\"%s\"\n"
>> > - "finding check constraints for table \"%s\".\"%s\"\n"
>> Cool additions. There may be a more elegant way to check if namespace
>> is NULL, but I couldn't come up with one myself. So patch may be fine.
>>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I think this small patch was lost. There are something wrong?

Did it get added to a CommitFest?

I don't see it there.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Least Active Transaction ID function
Next
From: Rohit Goyal
Date:
Subject: Re: Least Active Transaction ID function