Re: Acceptable/Best formatting of callbacks (for pluggable storage) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Acceptable/Best formatting of callbacks (for pluggable storage)
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoay_-rwyPGTTw4BAc=_MsvZdMc+BJMfut99Ld0BB74UBw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Acceptable/Best formatting of callbacks (for pluggable storage)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 9:42 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Use shorter method names?  This sounds like an ugly workaround for
> a carpal-tunnel-syndrome-inducing design.

What would you suggest instead of something like
"relation_set_new_filenode"?  I agree that shorter names have some
merit, but it's not always easy to figure out how to shorten them
without making the result unclear.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Acceptable/Best formatting of callbacks (for pluggable storage)
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs