Re: New CF app deployment - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: New CF app deployment
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoavoT_7DEwpsJ6otrBejJcRQXkThZSPRT10Rgtsq4KHMA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New CF app deployment  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: New CF app deployment
Re: New CF app deployment
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> Ok, I've pushed an attempt at doing this.
>
> For each mailthread, you can now create annotations. Each annotation is
> connected to a mail in the thread, and has a free text comment field. The
> message will then automatically be "highlighted" out of the archives and a
> direct link to the message include, alongside the text comment.
>
> I *think* this is approximately what people wanted, so let's give it a shot.
> If you have a chance, please test it out and comment as soon as you can - if
> I'm completely off track with how it's done, we should back it out and try a
> different way before we start putting actual valuable data into it, so we
> don't end up with multiple different ways of doing it in the end...

Hmm.  This kind of looks like the right idea, but it's hard to use,
because all you've got to work with is the subject of the message
(which is the same for all), the time it was sent, and the author.  In
the old system, you could look at the message in the archives and then
copy-and-paste in the message ID.  That's obviously a bit manual, but
it worked.

I suppose what would be really spiffy is if the integration of the
archives and the CF app could be such that you could see the whole
message and then click "annotate this message".

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: "multiple backends attempting to wait for pincount 1"
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Manipulating complex types as non-contiguous structures in-memory