Re: CTE optimization fence on the todo list? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: CTE optimization fence on the todo list?
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoauX9XwLNLXSM3THfAkT=19PRVeeGYxCZOnsJPZpb9Q8w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CTE optimization fence on the todo list?  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
Responses Re: CTE optimization fence on the todo list?  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com> wrote:
> ISTR a comment to the effect of the SQL standard effectively requires
> current behavior.

I'd be astonished.  The SQL standard doesn't even know that there is
such a thing as an index, so I presume it doesn't dictate the behavior
of the query planner either.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: Broken handling of NULLs in TG_ARGV
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: CTE optimization fence on the todo list?