On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com> wrote:
>> ISTR a comment to the effect of the SQL standard effectively requires
>> current behavior.
>
> I'd be astonished. The SQL standard doesn't even know that there is
> such a thing as an index, so I presume it doesn't dictate the behavior
> of the query planner either.
I agree. Somehow, the idea that this is within the standard caught on,
but I'm almost certain it's false.
--
Peter Geoghegan
