On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> This would clearly be an adjustment to the submitted patch, which
> happens regularly during the review and commit process and is part of
> the commitfest process, so I don't agree that holding it to new-feature
> level is correct when it's a change which is entirely relevant to this
> new feature, and one which a committer is asking to be included as part
> of the change. Nor do I feel particularly bad about asking for feature
> authors to be prepared to rework parts of their feature based on
> feedback during the commitfest process.
Obviously, reworking the patch is an expected part of the CommitFest
process. However, I disagree that what you're asking for can in any
way be fairly characterized that way. You're not trying to make it do
the thing that it does better or differently. You're trying to make
it do a second thing.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
